Not Too High, Not Too Low: Emotions and their Relationship to
Learning
Keila
Escobedo
Ball State
University
EDAC 635:
Strategies for Teaching Adults
Dr. Bo Chang
February 21,
2021
Name |
Commented on |
Keila
Escobedo |
|
Main Theoretical Points
Emotions and
their relationship to learning are contextualized within the interconnected
concepts of arousal, stress, and anxiety. A learner’s arousal, stress, and/or anxiety levels can either promote or
inhibit one’s learning ability. The first concept mentioned, arousal,
refers to the energy levels within the human body, and includes physical
responses such as increased adrenaline, heart rate, and blood pressure. When
these levels are minimal, the brain may experience being attentive or aware.
When these levels are increased to optimal, the brain experiences an
appropriate state for learning. When these levels continue to increase beyond
optimal, emotions are developed and are experienced as either positive or
negative by the individual. Another increase in arousal could result in extreme
emotions such as “euphoria” being experienced as positive or “distress” being
experienced as negative. Regardless of the perceived positivity or negativity
of the extreme emotion, neither are conducive to learning (MacKeracher, 2004).
Since a learner
must be in an optimal state of arousal to learn, this also means that a learner
must feel safe in the learning environment. An arousal state that arises in response
to perceived threats is “stress”. This stems from humans’ primitive fight-flight-freeze
defense mechanism, and when one cannot relieve the threat, stress can increase
to the previously mentioned distress, which is a state incompatible with the
ability to learn (MacKeracher, 2004). Although this emotion originates from
one’s primal survival instincts, a learner doesn’t have to be facing a grizzly
bear in the woods to feel distress. This feeling can arise in a learning
environment in the form of receiving negative feedback from the teacher, failing
to demonstrate a role-play correctly in front of the group, or more physically,
having to walk through an unlit parking lot at night to reach the learning
venue.
A related
arousal state that may arise is “anxiety”, which is triggered by fear of which
the source is not identified. Anxiety differs from stress in that the source of
one’s fear is clear when experiencing stress. Whether or not this is actually
occurring in the external world, the internal self fears it to be true. In
addition to this perceived external factor “not going to plan”, anxiety can
also include an individual’s focus on “what if” scenarios, and can manifest as
“worry and rumination, leading to, among other things, cognitive
distractibility”, thus inhibiting the ability to learn (Corr, 2011). However,
if the source of the fear can be named and essentially become “real”, it can
become less threatening, thus providing anxiety management (MacKeracher, 2004).
In addition to
feeling optimally aroused and safe, learners must also be able to channel their
feelings of motivation into change outcomes as a result of learning.
“Motivation” is the “tendency within a person to produce organized and directed
behavior” (MacKeracher, 2004). Motivational needs can be split into four types:
deficit, growth, achievement, or affiliation needs. The first two needs widely
depend upon the content of the learning environment. The first, “deficit needs”,
refers to a focus on survival and security, not only of one’s self, but also
those within the one’s social network, such as family. These may include
learning experiences such as driver’s education, training for a job, or substance
rehabilitation. The second, “growth needs”, refers to positive goals such as
connecting with others or promoting one’s self-esteem and/or
self-actualization. These may include professional development trainings, networking
events, leisure learning, or self-help workshops. The latter two needs
mentioned depend more upon the individual, regardless of the content being
learned. “Achievement needs” refer to an individual’s tendency to work alone, and
is fueled by the desire to “reduce feelings of powerlessness and incompetence”
and “to improve self-esteem and self-concept”, while “affiliation needs” refer
to an individual’s tendency to with others, and is fueled by the desire to
“reduce isolation and alienation, to build and improve interpersonal
relationships, and to create and maintain communal and collaborative groups”
(MacKeracher, 2004). Knowing the unmet needs implied in the learning space as
either deficit or growth needs, in addition to knowing a learner’s tendencies
to function autonomously or in collaboration with others, can help the
facilitator to direct a learner’s motivation to be most productive.
A final key
point of emotions and their ties to learning is the concept of “learning how to
learn”. As there are a multitude of different learning styles that are
door-opening for some, and barriers for others, it is important for the learner
to be “managers of their own change”, with their focus on “their own actions,
ideas, and learning processes” (MacKeracher, 2004). This requires a learner’s
ability to look introspectively at their own preferred learning styles, trust
themselves to do such work, and know when to ask for help. This level of
self-directedness depends upon the learner first feeling a level of arousal
that is conducive to clear-thinking, feeling safe and free from threats, and
being able to use their motivation to productively direct their own learning.
Emotions,
stress, and anxiety all relate to different levels of arousal and all have the
ability to either support a state of mind conducive to learning or inhibit
learning abilities. Some effects of emotions, stress, and anxiety on learning
and information processing include lack of motivation, poor communication, and
misunderstanding information. Facilitators must be aware of emotions and their
relationship to learning by ensuring learners are optimally aroused, feel safe,
and are open and able to appropriately use their motivation to process the change
that occurs when learning. Finally, the meta-concept of learning how to learn
ties together these elements of how emotions affect the learning process.
Applications
I find the following four theoretical points of emotions and their relationship to learning, including the listed respective strategies for accomplishing each, to be informative for adult education practitioners:
1) A learner’s arousal, stress, and/or anxiety levels can either promote or
inhibit one’s learning ability, with optimal arousal levels being the most
conducive to learning; therefore, a facilitator should begin the learning experience with intent to lower anxiety
levels. Strategies for doing so include:
· Sending learners an email with details in
preparation for the learning experience, including how to access the learning
space, any pre-session assignments learners should complete prior to the first
day, a detail of learning expectations, as well as contact information in case
assistance is required (Lawson, 2016).
· Planning buffer time for learner adjustments
such as technological difficulties (for virtual learning spaces) or finding the
learning space (for physical learning spaces). This also includes knowing that
not everyone in the learning space may have completed the aforementioned
pre-sessions assignment, so leaving time in the session to address that
possibility (Lawson, 2016).
· Providing account of overall learning experience
to come, such as through an agenda or syllabus. This can be sent in the
previously mentioned preparation email, as well as given on the first day.
2) A learner must feel safe in the learning environment to have the ability to learn; therefore, a facilitator should promote both a safe physical and safe relational learning space. Strategies for doing so include:
· Mitigating potential physical threats present in
learning environment. Within the learning environment, this could include
ensuring all the chairs to be used are stable and that any wiring on the ground
is taped down so reduce the risk of tripping. Outside of the learning
environment, this could include ensuring that the pathway to the learning venue
is well-lit with visible and ample signage (Davidson, 2017).
· Establishing group learning agreements,
especially for topics which may be personal for individuals or are considered
controversial. This allows for the discussion space to have expectations of
conduct that all learners have agreed to observe, and that the facilitator can
direct learners back to in case of transgression (Davidson, 2017).
· Encouraging learners to let the facilitator know
if a space feels unsafe, so that the facilitator may address the potential
barrier to learning (Davidson, 2017).
3) A
learner must be able to channel their motivations to process the change that
occurs through learning to have a productive learning experience; therefore,
the facilitator should help learners maintain their motivations throughout the
learning experience. Strategies include:
· Finding out an individual learner’s motivations.
This could be through a consultation or a quiz-like survey. The results should
be shared with the facilitator so they are aware of what motivates that
specific learner (MacKeracher, 2004).
· Working with the learner to come up with goals
based on their motivations. This also supports the practice of allowing adult
learners to lead their own learning experiences (MacKeracher, 2004).
· Providing feedback on the chosen goals. Because
of the individualized nature of the goals and the sensitive nature of receiving
feedback on one’s progress, feedback should be provided to the learner
one-on-one. Feedback that is strengths-based, even when addressing areas of
improvement, promotes feelings of success and/or satisfaction (Aguinis et
al., 2012).
4) A learner must “learn how to learn”,
according to their own individual learning needs, to have a productive learning
experience; therefore, a facilitator should help a learner “learn how to
learn”. Strategies include:
· Offering opportunities for learners to recognize
their most conducive learning styles. This could be done through a consultation
or quiz-like assessment.
· Facilitating content through various channels to
cater to different learning styles. This way, multiple learning styles that are
potentially within the learning group are covered (Lawson, 2016).
· Encouraging learners to consult with the
facilitator when help managing the learning process is necessary. Adults may
have difficulty coming forward to ask for help, so a welcoming and
non-judgmental facilitator attitude is vital (MacKeracher, 2004).
Reflection
Highlights
I found the
most significant part of emotions and their relationship to learning to be its
focus on the individual and their emotions. Because one’s emotions and reactions
to a certain stimulant will depend entirely upon their own personal life
experiences, one learner’s reaction to a topic may differ significantly from
another learner’s, even if it’s the exact same content presented in the exact
same way. While a facilitator can attempt to mitigate elements that may push a
learner’s arousal levels above optimum, it is important for a facilitator to
recognize that not every trigger can be planned for. A facilitator should
encourage individual learners to come to them with anything that is proving to
be a barrier to learning, so the facilitator can tend to that individual
learner’s needs.
Process
I began this review by looking back at a previous assignment from this class, “Assignment 2: Topic Summary & Selection”. It was helpful for me to review what I already learned about this topic and have somewhere to start, which for most of us, is the hardest part. In addition, I reviewed the chapter titled “Emotions and Motives in Learning” from the assigned book, Making Sense of Adult Learning by Dorothy MacKeracher. From here, I used two databases to search for more sources: Ball State University’s online library and Google Scholar. I organized the review by filling out the table below first, and then completing the review sections titled “Main Theoretical Ideas” and “Applications”. As I wrote the review, I amended the table as needed to reflect the body paragraphs.
Although I learned technical skills through writing this review, such as how to efficiently navigate Ball State University’s online library (as this is my first semester at BSU), I also learned the power of motivation through social support. Throughout the week, our group has been using Microsoft Teams to keep up with one another, and an unexpected lesson I learned is to be open to admitting feelings of intimidation, fear, or vulnerability with others who are tasked with the same undertaking. Their honest admissions of uncertainty laced with words of encouragement were unforeseen but valuable factors in me believing in my own abilities to learn. My tip: Get to really know your group members – they may be more valuable to your learning process than you know.
Main theoretical ideas | Applications | |
A learner’s arousal, stress, and/or anxiety levels can either promote or inhibit one’s learning ability, with optimal arousal levels being the most conducive to learning. | A facilitator should begin the learning experience with intent to lower anxiety levels, as most adult learners come into learning spaces with already established levels of stress and/or arousal. Strategies include: · Sending preparation emails · Planning buffer time for adjustments (ex. technological error, finding learning space, etc.) · Providing account of overall learning experience to come (ex. agenda, syllabus, etc.) | |
A learner must feel safe in the learning environment to have the ability to learn. | A facilitator should promote a safe physical and relational learning space. Strategies include: · Mitigating potential physical threats present in learning environment, including pathway to the specific learning space · Establishing group learning agreements · Encouraging learners to let the facilitator know if a space feels unsafe | |
A learner must be able to channel their motivations to process the change that occurs through learning to have a productive learning experience. | A facilitator should help learners maintain their motivations throughout the learning experience. Strategies include: · Finding out an individual learner’s motivations · Working with the learner to come up with goals based on their motivations · Providing feedback on the chosen goals | |
A learner must “learn how to learn”, according to their own individual learning needs, to have a productive learning experience. | A facilitator should first help learners “learn how to learn”. Strategies include: · Offering opportunities for learners to recognize their most conducive learning styles · Facilitating content through various channels to cater to different learning styles · Encouraging learners to consult with the facilitator when help managing the learning process is necessary | |
References
Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K.,
& Joo, H. (2012). Delivering effective performance feedback: The
strengths-based approach. Business Horizons, 55(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.004
Corr, P. J. (2011). Anxiety:
Splitting the phenomenological atom. Personality and Individual Differences,
50(7), 889–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.013
Davidson, S. (2017). Trauma-Informed
Practices for Postsecondary Education: A Guide. Education Northwest.
Lawson, K. (2016). The trainer’s
handbook. (4th ed.). Wiley.
MacKeracher, D. (2004). Making
sense of adult learning (2nd ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Keila,
ReplyDeleteYour theory review was well-laid out, concise, and clearly written, which made it easy to read through from start to finish.
I gained a more broad understanding of each component of emotions as it relates to stress than I already had reading through the chapter myself, so nice work bringing in material from other sources.
I found the application portion of your review to be the strongest, in that I immediately thought to myself that these suggestions must be used for our group project. The atmosphere the facilitator will create if using your techniques will be both safe and productive. When I think of safety, I tend to consider outside threats entering the classroom, but you even mention little things like the chairs and wiring being safe for the students. That is excellent!
Finally, I wanted to agree with your comment about our group. It's difficult to find connection and safety in an online learning environment but our group has truly created a safe, supportive place where I know I can let me guard down. This feeling motivates me to not let the group down, which I can now attribute to the need for affiliation thanks to your review.
I enjoyed reading through your theory review, nice work.